<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Laws Discourage Telecommuting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/</link>
	<description>Maximizing Shareholder Value with HR and Homeshoring</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: f1a39c61146035fabe905c2aa867262a</title>
		<link>http://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-6344</link>
		<dc:creator>f1a39c61146035fabe905c2aa867262a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-6344</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;f1a39c61146035fabe905c2aa867262a&lt;/strong&gt;

f1a39c61146035fabe905c2aa867262a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>f1a39c61146035fabe905c2aa867262a</strong></p>
<p>f1a39c61146035fabe905c2aa867262a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tampa TV Repair</title>
		<link>http://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>Tampa TV Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tampa TV Repair&lt;/strong&gt;

Tampa / Hillsborough TV Repair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tampa TV Repair</strong></p>
<p>Tampa / Hillsborough TV Repair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anal rape free pics</title>
		<link>http://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-5483</link>
		<dc:creator>anal rape free pics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-5483</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;anal rape free pics&lt;/strong&gt;

ka-ka-sh-ka 2509542 The anal rape free pics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>anal rape free pics</strong></p>
<p>ka-ka-sh-ka 2509542 The anal rape free pics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wed27</title>
		<link>http://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>Wed27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-974</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wed27&lt;/strong&gt;

I have enjoyed reading your article, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wed27</strong></p>
<p>I have enjoyed reading your article, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Wagman</title>
		<link>http://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wagman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hrhomeshoring.wordpress.com/2006/06/20/tax-laws-discourage-telecommuting/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Just to add more bad news.  Not that this should surprise anyone, but NJ has also stated that the &quot;convenience/ necessity tests&quot; provided in the NY ruling applies to NJ.  See the below correspondence of 2/19/2004.

[Dear CCH:]


The Division of Taxation acknowledges receipt of your letter dated February 19, 2004 requesting information on New Jersey&#039;s method of allocating wages for telecommuters.

Currently New Jersey like New York still uses the convenience/necessity test for the allocation of wages.

If you require additional information please feel free to contact my office.

Very truly yours,


Michael J. Roach, Chief


Individual Tax Audit Branch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add more bad news.  Not that this should surprise anyone, but NJ has also stated that the &#8220;convenience/ necessity tests&#8221; provided in the NY ruling applies to NJ.  See the below correspondence of 2/19/2004.</p>
<p>[Dear CCH:]</p>
<p>The Division of Taxation acknowledges receipt of your letter dated February 19, 2004 requesting information on New Jersey&#8217;s method of allocating wages for telecommuters.</p>
<p>Currently New Jersey like New York still uses the convenience/necessity test for the allocation of wages.</p>
<p>If you require additional information please feel free to contact my office.</p>
<p>Very truly yours,</p>
<p>Michael J. Roach, Chief</p>
<p>Individual Tax Audit Branch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
